To return to the previous page, close this window Drinking Water Contaminant Removal Table
|
The Contaminant Removal Table itself begins just below
the Key:
|
Key to the Contaminant Removal Table |
|
Contaminant Type |
|
H | Health Hazard |
N | Nuisance contaminant, may cause problems with the plumbing, odors, |
B | Beneficial (in the case of chlorine, the benefit is not because it is an essential mineral, like calcium or copper, rather chlorination has played a critical role in protecting the world's drinking water supply from waterborne infectious diseases for nearly 100 years) |
BH | Contaminant is beneficial at low doses but can cause health problems at higher levels. Fluoride is a classic example. It provides protection from cavities at levels of about 1 part per million (ppm). At 1.5-2 ppm it can cause staining of the teeth, and at 4 ppm or above it may cause bone problems. |
Removal effectiveness of the treatment method on a contaminant |
|
D | Disinfection - Effectiveness depends on the proper dose and contact time of the disinfection agent. |
R | Mostly Removed - If the device is working properly |
S | Some Removal - may depend on what chemical form the contaminant is in at the time of treatment, iron and arsenic are examples. |
M | Depends on the manufacturer, particularly for activated carbon filters where special manufacturing processes can increase the level of specific contaminants removed. Ask manufacturer for independent certification of removal (and the percent removal). A claim of "removes or reduces lead" can be true if the unit removes 10% or 99.99%. |
C | Boiling concentrates those contaminants not removed or killed |
add | Some disinfection methods can add contaminants to the drinking water |
Approximate ongoing cost of treatment per gallon 2 (not including the initial cost of the system) | ||||||||||||
Inorganic Contaminants EPA - Basic Information about Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants |
||||||||||||
Whole House Treatments: | ||||||||||||
Inorganic Contaminants | Hard Water: Calcium & Magnesium | Arsenic | Asbestos | Chlorine | Copper | Fluoride |
Iron and/or
Manganese 1 |
Mercury | Lead | Nitrates | Other Inorganics | |
Contaminant Type: |
BN | H | H | BNH | BH | BH | N | H | H | H | depends | |
Chlorination Does not treat most inorganic contaminants |
add | R 1 with filtration |
Less than $0.01 | |||||||||
Water
softener (cation exchange) |
R | S | S 1 | S add Na 7 |
Less than $0.01 | |||||||
Anion exchange | Cation, anion, or mixed bed ion exchange resins can be used to remove a wide variety of inorganic contaminants. | Depends | ||||||||||
Magnetic conditioning | ? 3 | Less than $0.01 | ||||||||||
Whole house sediment filter | R 1 if precipitated |
Less than $0.01 | ||||||||||
Whole house GAC filter | R 5 | R 1 if precipitated |
Less than $0.01 | |||||||||
Ozone | R 1 | Less than $0.01 | ||||||||||
Manganese Greensand oxidization filter | S 83% |
R 1 | R some hydrogen sulfide |
Less than $0.01 | ||||||||
Point of Use (POU) Treatments: | ||||||||||||
Inorganic Contaminants | Hard water, Calcium and Magnesium | Arsenic | Asbestos | Chlorine | Copper | Fluoride |
Iron and/or
Manganese 1 |
Mercury | Lead | Nitrates | Other Inorganics |
Cost |
Contaminant Type: |
BN | H | H | BNH | BH | BH | N | H | H | H | depends | |
Distillation | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R 99%+ |
R | R | $0.15 to $0.35 |
Reverse Osmosis (RO)
8 membrane filtration |
R | R | R | SM | R | R | R | R | R 85% |
R | R | $0.10 to $0.20 |
"Pitcher" filter - usually uses GAC & perhaps other materials like ion exchange resins 12 | R | M | R 1 if precipitated |
M | M | M | $0.15 to $0.25 | |||||
KDF filter | R | R | R | R | R | S | $0.01 to $0.05 | |||||
Ceramic filter | R | R 1 if precipitated |
Less than $0.01 | |||||||||
Granulated Activated Carbon (GAC) filter 5 | R | R 1 if precipitated |
M | Less than $0.01 to $0.05 | ||||||||
Solid Block Activated Carbon
(SBAC) filter with sub-micron pores My recommendation for a simple, effective solution to many common drinking water problems. 11 |
R | R | R 1 if precipitated |
M | M | $0.05 to $0.10 | ||||||
Activated alumina filtration | R | R | S | add aluminum |
Less than $0.01 | |||||||
Ultraviolet (UV) disinfection 10 | Less than $0.01 | |||||||||||
Boiling (a rolling boil for at least 5 minutes - longer at higher altitudes) | C | C | C | R | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | ? |
Bottled water | Bottled water is unique among the other treatment methods listed, because the consumer does not have any control over the purification process. All harmful contaminants should be removed by the water bottler. Bottled water, however, does not have to meet any higher levels of purity or safety than tap water. To insure the quality of your bottled water, make certain that you purchase water certified by NSF or that the manufacturer is a member of the International Bottled Water Association (IBWA) | $0.25 to $1.50 or more |
Some other drinking water contaminants | Treatment Methods |
Turbidity, suspended fine sand, clay, other small particles | Use sand filtration for large quantities of suspended particulates or use a sediment filter or sedimentation (allowing the particles to settle out of suspension) for smaller quantities of sediment. |
Hydrogen sulfide gas (rotten egg odor) | Remove by using chlorination and a sedimentation filter or an oxidizing (i.e. greensand) filter followed by activated carbon filter. |
Many odor and taste problems other than rotten egg smells | Use an activated carbon filter. |
Sulfate | Remove small amounts for drinking or cooking by RO or distillation. Use ion exchange for whole house treatment. |
Acidity
- pH lower than 7 |
pH correction using either a tank-type neutralizing filter with processed calcium or magnesia in combination with calcium as the media, a chemical feed pump to inject a neutralizing solution (soda ash, potassium or sodium hydroxide) into the water, or a pressure filter tank filled with limestone chips. |
Alkalinity - pH higher than 7 |
pH correction using either a neutralizing filter or chemical-feed pump to lower the pH |
Radon
and Radionucleotides
Click here for more Links |
Aeration is very effective for removing radon from drinking water. Radon can also be removed with an Activated Carbon filter. Radium can be removed with RO, cation exchange, and distillation. |
|
2 - The costs are very approximate because of a wide variety of
factors. Listed costs also do not include the initial expense of the
treatment equipment. The ongoing costs listed are mostly useful for POU and bottled water users and are meant to give you a feel for the relative expenses you would incur over a period of time. For example, bottled water at about $0.25 to more than $1.00 per gallon (much more if you purchase "designer" water) would cost at least 3 to more than 10 times as much as an equivalent amount of purified water filtered through a carbon block filter at about $0.05 to $0.10 per gallon. If economics are important to you and you are using more than a couple of gallons of treated water a week, this information might be useful. Back to chart. |
3 - I am afraid I do not know anything about magnetic or electromagnetic conditioning of water. I do not have a hard water problem and thus have not had a motivation to try the technique. I have also not been able to get any unbiased information on the effectiveness of this treatment. I listed it here because it is a widely advertised alternative to traditional water softening which is not particularly environmental (or health) friendly, and, if it actually works, would be a valuable addition to hard water treatment methods. If anyone has first hand experience with these devices or knows of a link to an independent review article, please let me know, and I will report anything I discover. Back to chart. |
4 - Reverse Osmosis, Ceramic Filters, and
Carbon Block Filters can have pore sizes of 0.5 micron or less (RO membranes are
far smaller) which can remove many harmful bacteria very effectively. It
is best, however, not to depend on these treatments for your primary, ongoing
disinfection method for water that is known (or suspected) to have harmful
bacterial contamination. A damaged filter element could allow enough
bacteria into the "filtered water" stream to cause illness - and there
would be no way to detect the problem without constant testing. They are
definitely reliable enough, however, to be used as a backup system with normally
safe domestic water (in case of accidental contamination) or for water treatment
in case of an emergency where normal water distribution is disrupted and the
available water may be contaminated.. (Granular Activated Carbon) filters (because of the inconsistent pore size discussed below) will NOT safely remove bacteria from drinking water. You will see some of these systems marketed with embedded silver - this is to help prevent trapped bacteria from growing within the filter media. I have not seen any independent tests on the ability of KDF filters to reduce bacterial contamination from running water. From my reading, it appears that the KDF media prevents trapped bacteria from growing or multiplying. Back to chart. |
5 - Activated carbon, whether as fairly large granules, in granulated
activated carbon (GAC) filters, or compressed into solid carbon blocks filters,
is very effective at removing a wide variety of organic compounds. I
placed a S 5 for whole house and point of use GAC filters
because 1) water moves through a whole house carbon filter (unless it is enormous) too fast for complete removal of anything except particles smaller than the largest pore size (usually 10-20 microns), and 2) GAC filters, because they contain loose carbon particles and are prone to channeling, where the flowing water creates relatively large channels through the filter medium. Water moving through these channels does not have much contact with the activated carbon, and thus, filtration of the channeled water is minimal. However, if organic chemicals are a significant contaminant in the water entering your home, a whole house, GAC filter will help reduce the level of these contaminants. This is important, because many organics can vaporize in a shower, for instance, and be inhaled. If you choose a whole house carbon filter, be aware of their limitations though, and seriously consider a Point of Use SBAC filtration system to treat your drinking and cooking water. Also, if you have a yard or garden that is watered by your household water, and if it is at all possible, consider splitting your water line so unfiltered water is sent to your outside taps - otherwise you must change the filter much more often. Back to chart. |
6 - Iron bacteria are mostly a problem for people using wells water with
high iron or manganese concentrations. The bacteria themselves do not
necessarily clog filters, but the brown slime they produce may. None of the POU treatment devices would be effective for the treatment of iron bacteria. If this is a problem, one of the methods described below should be used to remove the bacteria and "slime" before the water reaches a POU device. The Penn State Extension has a site, The Facts on Iron Bacteria, that provides additional information about preventing and treating the problem. |
There are several types of ion exchange resins available to treat different water contaminants, cation (water softeners - removes positively charged ions), anion (removes negatively charged ions like nitrates and sulfates), and mixed bed resins containing both cation and anion resins. Back to chart. |
8 - A RO systems should come with a pre-filter (a sediment filter and
perhaps a chlorine filter) to remove contaminants that would damage the RO
membranes. A Reverse Osmosis filtration system should also come with a
high quality Activated Carbon filter to remove organic and some inorganic
compounds that are not removed by the RO membranes. Besides RO there
are other types of
membrane filtration (Microfiltration, Ultrafiltration &
Nanofiltration), where water is forced through different size
semi-permeable membranes. Read note 4 for information about microbial filtration. Back to chart. |
9 - Water usually contains dissolved gases and may contain other substances, like some of the organic chemicals, that can be volatilized at temperatures below the boiling point. When the boiling point of volatile chemicals is near water, it is difficult to separate these materials from water using distillation. In addition, the separation of steam from the liquid that contains dissolved solids is not absolute. Minute amounts of the dissolved materials will be carried along with the steam. Distillation normally removes over 99.9 percent of many dissolved materials. A gas vent, fractional column, or carbon filter should be included with any distillation system you purchase to remove the volatile contaminants. Back to chart. |
10 - Ultraviolet (UV) light is capable only of
disinfecting water, no other contaminants are removed. Different pathogens
require different doses for treatment (cysts require a higher dose than most
bacteria, for example), so make certain any UV system you consider is capable of
killing the specific microbe(s) you are concerned about. In order for UV disinfection to be completely effective, the water coming into the UV chamber must be extremely clean. Any particulate material may "shadow" the pathogens and allow live microbes to exit the UV system. Back to chart. |
11 - Solid Block Activated Carbon Filters are
not usually described separately from loose carbon (GAC) filters.
This article does a good job starting on page 24. The list of
water contaminants and available treatment technologies can be rather
overwhelming. After
all is said and done, though, a high quality, Solid Block Activated Carbon filter
(SBAC) (designed to remove the most common drinking water contaminants) would be my recommendation for
probably 80%+ of people concerned about their drinking water quality -
the other 20%,or so may have more serious contaminant problems, and will need to
explore more complex (and expensive) treatment solutions specific to their
situation. After considerable research, a (SBAC) filter was the solution I selected for my home. My strategy was to figure out what contaminants were actually in my water (or might be released into my water due to an accident) and then choose the treatment method: 1) that would reliably remove those contaminants, 2) had the lowest operating and maintenance costs over the 30 - 40 years I planned to use it, and 3) be the easiest to use and required the least maintenance. Denver municipal water, like water from most medium to large public water sources is very good quality overall, but it contains chlorine and disinfection byproducts (DBPs). Even though the DBPs were present at levels below the EPA maximum contaminant levels, they were still of concern because of the health risks of long term exposure (discussed elsewhere on my site). Although I did not test for lead, I strongly suspected it was present in our 55 year old home, because (as discussed elsewhere), lead is quite prevalent in both new and older homes. Contaminants I was concerned might be released into the water because of an accident included E. coli, giardia or cryptosporidia cysts, and possibly some organic contaminants like MTBE. Arsenic, and other harmful inorganics, like nitrates, cadmium, etc. were very unlikely to ever be our municipal water in significant or harmful quantities. Other Organic contaminants like pesticides and solvents were also unlikely to ever be present, although a SBAC filter will remove wide variety of organic compounds. There were four available technologies that would fairly simply remove all the contaminants that I wanted to protect my family and me against; Bottled Water from a certified company, Distillation, Reverse Osmosis, and Solid Block Activated Carbon filters. Of these four treatment methods, SBAC filtration systems were easily the simplest to use and maintain (normally one filter change every year or so). SBAC filtration also had the lowest ongoing costs at about $1.00 per week for up to about 14 gallons of purified water per week ($2.00 a week if you filter 14-28 gallons/week, and so on). Most people using regulated municipal water will have home water characteristics similar to mine - fairly clean, biologically safe water with known contaminant levels, and a low risk of accidental contamination. A SBAC filtration system would be an ideal choice if this describes your water. Even if you soften your water, a SBAC filtration system would be a good addition to your treatment plan, because softening, by itself, does not remove any contaminants harmful to health that might be present. People using well water with the same characteristics as described above would also benefit from the protection of a SBAC filtration system. Back to chart. |
Final thoughts and disclaimer: Any person who requires water of a specific microbiological purity should follow the advice of their doctor or local health officials regarding the use and consumption of tap water treated by ANY purification system. |
Other considerations for purchasing a water treatment system (or bottled
water)
|
To return to the previous page, close this window |
|
Copyright © 2005 Randy Johnson. All rights reserved. | Updated November 2011 |